Tuesday, August 20, 2013

A Commentary on the Upanishads by Swami Nirmalananda Giri -9













A Commentary
on the Upanishads
by
Swami Nirmalananda Giri





A Commentary on the
Mundaka Upanishad

Knowing the ALL

It is an interesting trait of the Western mind that it wants encapsulations of things,
lists of “essentials,” advice on “shortcuts,” and “what is the one thing?…” in every
department of life and thought. Whether this is a desire for efficiency or a form of
intellectual minimalism or outright laziness is hard to say–chances are it varies from
person to person. Nevertheless, “getting to the heart of the matter” is something dear
to the heart of Americans, especially. They are not alone in this attitude. The
upanishads reflect the same mentality. Perhaps that is why Vivekananda considered
the West, and America particularly, as being more suited to the teachings of Vedanta–
the upanishads–than the contemporary East.
In the first section of the Mundaka Upanishad we find the highest expression of
this attitude:
“Out of the infinite ocean of existence arose Brahma, first-born and foremost
among the gods. From him sprang the universe, and he became its protector. The
knowledge of Brahman, the foundation of all knowledge, he revealed to his first-born
son, Atharva.” (Mundaka Upanishad 1:1:1)
A pre-creation story
According to Indian texts, at the beginning of the present creation cycle Brahma,
that person who was destined to be the creator/projector of the three worlds, awoke to
find himself in infinite, empty space. At first he felt fear, but then he laughed at his
foolishness, for there was no one there but him. Who would he fear? Then he
pondered his situation, attempting to comprehend it. At one point a great voice
resounded all around him, saying a single word: “Tapa”–meaning “do tapasya.” This
awakened Brahma’s memory of yoga meditation, so he began to mediate. After some
time he attained full memory of his past as well as the knowledge of how to create the
worlds–which he did. He also became established in direct perception of Brahman.
Among his “children” brought forth through his meditation, was Atharva, to whom
he taught the way to realize Brahman. “In turn Atharva taught this same knowledge of
Brahman to Angi. Angi, again, taught it to Satyabaha, who revealed it to
Angiras.” (Mundaka Upanishad 1:1:2)
The essence of knowledge
“To Angiras came upon a time Sounaka, the famous householder, and asked
respectfully: ‘Holy sir, what is that by which all else is known?’” (Mundaka Upanishad
1:1:3)
We have already been told that the knowledge of Brahman, Brahmavidya, is the
foundation of all knowledge. But Sounaka has a very salutary impatience and ambition.

He wants to know what is the one thing which, being known, causes all to be known.
This is both a wise quest and a wise attitude. Little Red Riding Hood ended up in the
wolf’s stomach because she dawdled on the way instead of going straight to her
destination. If we look at the history of religions we will find that the countries which
produce the most enlightened persons are those countries which have produced
empires. For when such people turn to spiritual life they go after the loftiest spiritual
attainments–they become imperialists of the spirit! They seek out the most direct
way…and go there. Sounaka is one of them–and hopefully so are we. Knowledge is the
subject of the question, so Angiras lays a foundation for his answer.
“Those who know Brahman,” replied Angiras, “say that there are two kinds of
knowledge, the higher and the lower.
“The lower is knowledge of the Vedas (the Rik, the Sama, the Yajur, and the
Atharva), and also of phonetics, ceremonials, grammar, etymology, metre, and
astronomy. The higher is knowledge of that by which one knows the changeless
reality.” (Mundaka Upanishad 1:1:4-5)
Analysis of knowledge
Now we should look at this very carefully. First of all, who do we believe? When I
first emerged from the deadly cocoon of fundamentalist Protestantism my intellectual
world was quite simple–simplistic, actually. Fortunately I first read the Bhagavad Gita
and then Autobiography of a Yogi. The next step was to get out of my deadly
environment, so within a few months I was on the plane to California and wider
horizons.
But I discovered in a short time that wider horizons can have a drawback. I began
encountering just about every shade of philosophical and religious thought and
attitude, most of them incompatible with each other. Almost daily I was told conflicting
things, and always with the utmost confidence. As someone once said: “The problem
with ignorance is that it picks up confidence as it goes along.” I loved being in the
wide-open mental spaces of California (and I still do), but which way should I go? Who
could–or should–I trust? Since I had been shaken out of my spiritual entombment by
learning of the yoga tradition I wisely followed the principle that only those who know
God really know anything. So I sought out the teachings of illumined yogis of past and
present, discarding those inauspicious Indian teachers who claimed to have a new
revelation for a new age, and only paying attention to those who were right in the
center of the Eternal Dharma. (Once somebody asked me what a great yogi’s
“distinctive teachings” were. “None!” I replied with satisfaction. “If he taught anything
‘new” I would have nothing to do with him. Truth is eternal.”) I appreciated it if the
English was good (and equally if the book was free from typos), and expressed in a
way that someone in the twentieth century like myself could comprehend, but I wanted
to know what all the great yogis throughout history knew: the tried and proven way to
God.
My great blessing was being able to trek many times to the Vedanta Bookshop in
Hollywood. There I found an abundance of eternal wisdom, the same wisdom that had
been flowing in a life-giving stream for countless ages–like the holy Ganga. The Ganga
that emerges at Gangotri high in the Himalayas is the same Ganga that flows into the
ocean at Gangasagar. In the same way I found on the shelves of that little shop the
same Sanatana Dharma spoken by the primeval sages of India. A little further east in
Hollywood at the Self-Realization Fellowship I listened every Sunday to an ideal

presentation of both the philosophy and spiritual practice of Eternal India. All this
prepared me for India where, as a friend of ours once said about the same pilgrimage,
“I got the idea.” And have treasured it ever since.
So those who know Brahman “say that there are two kinds of knowledge, the
higher and the lower.” The lower, they say, is the knowledge of scriptures, ritual,
philosophic, expression and suchlike–including, by the way, astrology. Please note that
they do not denounce these things as useless or as ignorance. They are definitely said
to be knowledge, and a sensible person appreciates and learns them to a reasonable
and practical degree. But it must be understood that the essential, “the higher is
knowledge of that by which one knows the changeless reality”–Brahman. The
knowledge which enables us to Know is to be sought for and prized above all else.
While writing this previous sentence I could clearly hear in memory the recorded
voice of Yogananda saying: “I walked my feet off from Cape Cormorin to the
Himalayas” in search of the knowledge that would reveal God to him.
The lesser knowledge tells us only of that which changes, including our own short
physical life. But the higher knowledge brings us to the Changeless Reality. “By this is
fully revealed to the wise that which transcends the senses, which is uncaused, which
is indefinable, which has neither eyes nor ears, neither hands nor feet, which is allpervading,
subtler than the subtlest–the everlasting, the source of all.” (Mundaka
Upanishad 1:1:6) The Absolute Consciousness, the Totality of Being, is shown to the
wise–to the yogis–by this knowledge.
And the world?
What about this world in which we find ourselves? Is it to be despised as worthless
and antithetical to Brahman, our Goal? Lest we think such a foolish thing Angiras
further says: “As the web comes out of the spider and is withdrawn, as plants grow
from the soil and hair from the body of man, so springs the universe from the eternal
Brahman.” (Mundaka Upanishad 1:1:7)
The world, then, is an extension or emanation of Brahman. In other words, the
world IS Brahman. We are living and moving in divinity manifesting as the world. Why,
then, do we say that the world is illusory? It is the world in our mind–our perception,
our interpretation, of the world–that is an illusion, not the world itself. In Indian texts
we continually find the simile of the snake in a rope or a man in tree. That is, in
darkness we see a rope lying on the ground and immediately “see” a snake lying
there–we see the glitter of its eyes and may even hear it hiss! Yet, when light is
brought we see only a rope. The rope was always real, was always there. The snake
was an illusion that existed only in our mind. In the same way, walking in the darkness
we may see a dead tree and mistake it for a human being, taking its branches for arms.
We may even see the “arms” move and think we see a face looking at us. But when we
come closer we see it is only a tree–and a dead one, at that. The tree was real, but the
man was not. Illusion is always a mental phenomenon, never a real or objective thing.
So it is illusion and ignorance we must decry, but never find fault with the world; for
the world is Brahman.
In both instances, rope and tree, we may experience great fear. But the moment we
see them for what they really are, our fear evaporates and we are at peace. This is how
it is with us and this world. Our illusions fill us with terrible fears and anxieties, all of
which will be dispelled when we see its actual nature as Brahman. No wonder, then,
that Krishna told Arjuna: “Even a little of this dharma delivers you from great

fear.” (Bhagavad Gita 2:40)
The chain of causation
The sage now gives us an outline of the process of the emanation of the world from
Brahman.
“Brahman willed that it should be so, and brought forth out of himself the material
cause of the universe; from this came the primal energy, and from the primal energy
mind, from mind the subtle elements, from the subtle elements the many worlds, and
from the acts performed by beings in the many worlds the chain of cause and effect–
the reward and punishment of works.” (Mundaka Upanishad 1:1:8)
Creation is also spoken of as expansions from Brahman, and that is the mode here.
Brahman first expands as primordial matter, than as primordial energy. From this
comes the intelligence inherent in creation, then the elements, and the various worlds
in which they predominate. The final ingredient, though, comes from the sentient
beings within the universe: karma. God supplies the stage and we supply the actions
and reactions which unfold upon the stage.
“Brahman sees all, knows all; he is knowledge itself. Of him are born cosmic
intelligence, name, form, and the material cause of all created beings and
things.” (Mundaka Upanishad 1:1:9) No wonder, then, that in the Gita, that great digest
of the upanishads, we find the words: “Brahman is the ritual, Brahman is the offering,
Brahman is he who offers to the fire that is Brahman. If a man sees Brahman in every
action, He will find Brahman.” (Bhagavad Gita 4:24)
Seeing is freeing.

Delusion and Ignorance
We usually think of delusion and ignorance in terms of “ordinary” life and its
situations. Those who are more occupied with “spiritual” matters assume that they are
beyond such, but Angiras thinks differently, and so should we.
“Finite and transient are the fruits of sacrificial rites. The deluded, who regard
them as the highest good, remain subject to birth and death.” (Mundaka Upanishad
1:2:7. Swami Prabhavananda has omitted verses 1 to 6 of this section as they
enumerate various technical aspects of Vedic sacrifices. Verse seven begins the
philosophical exposition of the external rites.) Swami Nikhilananda translates a bit
more literally: “Frail indeed are those rafts of sacrifices, therefore they are
destructible. Fools who rejoice in them as the Highest Good fall victims again and
again to old age and death.” “Back they must turn to the mortal pathway, subject still to
birth and to dying,” (Bhagavad Gita 9:3) says the Gita on the same subject.
Karma and religion
I think just about everybody puts karma into two lumps: Good Karma and Bad
Karma. But that is not very satisfactory. Karma, like all of life, has many nuances and
can vary greatly. Some karma, for example, creates more karma, and some actually
dissolves karma. For example, Sri Ramakrishna said that all spiritual practices are part
of Karma Yoga, but they deliver us from karma. There are material, mental, and
spiritual karmas. The material and mental karmas impel us to more of the same,
whether good or bad. But spiritual karma enables us to rise above the material and
mental planes and free ourselves from karmic bondage.
Angiras wants us to understand that religious karma is not always spiritual. This
should not surprise us when we can readily see that most religion is based on material
goals. “Stuff” and “happiness” just about sums up the motives of all the religions of the
world, including that of modern India. As a result, most religious acts culminate in
more mental and psychological involvement, not freedom. In the verses omitted by
Swami Prabhavananda it is pointed out that most religion creates karma that takes us
to heaven–and then dumps us back on earth when our “merit” is used up. So we end
back where we started. What a gyp.
Just because a religious act is either directed toward God or offered to God does
not mean it will ultimately lead to God. Usually it leads us away from God into the
labyrinth of relative existence in some form or other. Since most people have been
cultivating a taste for earthly things through life after life, this suits them. But it should
gall us, and we should refuse the pursuit and get off the merry-go-round.
Great suffering
So there are aspects of religion we should avoid adamantly. Otherwise: “Living in
the abyss of ignorance, yet wise in their own conceit, the deluded go round and round,
like the blind led by the blind.” (Mundaka Upanishad 1:2:8) “They be blind leaders of
the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch,” (Matthew 15:14)
said Jesus, surely having this verse in mind.
Swami Gambhirananda’s translation points out a sad aspect of all this: “Remaining
within the fold of ignorance, and thinking, ‘We are ourselves wise and learned,’ the

fools, while being buffeted very much, ramble about like the blind led by the blind
alone.” Buffeted very much. (“Being afflicted by many ills” is the translation of Swami
Nikhilananda.) How true. Promising others the cessation of all troubles and sorrows,
these religious mountebanks are more afflicted than ordinary people. Whether this is
from the negative karma accruing from their dishonesty or a manifestation of their
own inner diseases, the result is the same. “While they promise them liberty, they
themselves are the servants of corruption,” (II Peter 2:19) as Saint Peter put it.
You have better ways to spend your time, so I will not recount to you the
observations of over sixty years in which I have seen such hucksters and their dupes
literally undergoing “the sufferings of the damned.” And all the while they denounce
those taking another path as “deluded” and “of the devil.” Well, as Jesus said: “They
have their reward.” (Matthew 6:2, 5, 16) And they must like it, for they certainly cling
to it.
Such is the grave danger of externalized religion.
Great delusion
As I say, they love and cling to their miserable condition. As the upanishad
continues: “Living in the abyss of ignorance, the deluded think themselves blest.
Attached to works, they know not God. Works lead them only to heaven, whence, to
their sorrow, their rewards quickly exhausted, they are flung back to
earth.” (Mundaka Upanishad 1:2:9)
Then the heart of the matter is revealed in the next verse: “Considering religion to
be observance of rituals and performance of acts of charity, the deluded remain
ignorant of the highest good. Having enjoyed in heaven the reward of their good
works, they enter again into the world of mortals.” (Mundaka Upanishad 1:2:10)
Rituals of worship and good deeds certainly produce good karma, but that is not
the force that lifts us above samsara, the ever-turning wheel of birth and death. If our
religion consists only of outer observances it will condition our consciousness even
more to identify with the material level of existence. And that identification will be a
round-trip ticket for our return to another birth after another death!
Even helping others is spiritually valueless if it is not done with a wider, spiritual
perspective. One of the hallmarks of today’s ineffectual religion is its obsessive
involvement in social action and reform. When we look at the lives of saints we see
they were the most generous of people, even sacrificing themselves for others. But
they did these things not as their religion, but as an expression of their love for God
and His children–which is the true religion.
We must not “remain ignorant of the highest good,” but must seek that Highest
Good within through meditation and the cultivation of spiritual consciousness even
outside meditation. Unless we do this we will find ourselves shuttled right back to
earth on completion of our good “heaven karma.”

Wisdom and Truth
The wise
No one likes to be thought stupid, and all like to be thought intelligent. Even better
is it to be thought wise. Of course, in all ages there have been the fools that preferred
to be “cool” or “sharp” or “neat” or such idiotic expressions. The sad thing is that the
vast majority want to be thought of as smart or wise, but only a small percentage care
whether they really are smart or wise. The upanishad is meant for these latter people,
so the sage continues: “But wise, self-controlled, and tranquil souls, who are contented
in spirit, and who practice austerity and meditation in solitude and silence, are freed
from all impurity, and attain by the path of liberation to the immortal, the truly existing,
the changeless Self.” (Mundaka Upanishad 1:2:11)
Let us look at the traits of the wise. They are disciplined, and so are self-controlled.
As a result of their discipline they have become peaceful. Intent on spiritual
development, giving priority to the spirit, they have become contented–for outside the
spirit there is no peace or tranquility. This means that they are harmonious and
balanced, as well. They continually engage in those disciplines which purify them, and
by being so purified they are capable of becoming adept in meditation. As a result of
these qualities they are firmly on the path to liberation, and shall without doubt attain
to the Self which is the only truly existing thing, changeless and sure from eternity.
Some adjectives
Now a look at some Sanskrit terms will be helpful to us.
The wise are said to be aranye–living in the forest. At the time of the Gita, many
serious sadhakas lived on the outskirts of towns, preferring to live in the wooded areas
where neighbors would not be visible, even if somewhat near. This ideal is found twice
in the Gita: “Turn all your thought toward solitude, spurning the noise of the crowd, its
fruitless commotion.” (Bhagavad Gita 13:10) And: “When a man seeks solitude,…ever
engaged in his meditation on Brahman,…that man is ready for oneness with
Brahman.” (Bhagavad Gita 18:52, 53) It is not a matter of surrounding vegetation, but
the inward withdrawal from outer association that is being praised here. Even in a
crowded city we can live in “the forest” of inner solitude. In the thirteenth chapter of
Autobiography of a Yogi, the master yogi, Ram Gopal Muzumdar, asked Yogananda:
“Are you able to have a little room where you can close the door and be alone?” When
he said that he did have such a room, the saint told him: “That is your cave. That is
your sacred mountain. That is where you will find the kingdom of God.” Though that is
so, still the aspiring yogi should be extremely sparing of social contacts, and then only
with those who benefit him spiritually.
The first words of this verse in Sanskrit describe the wise as tapahshraddhe–an
interesting fusion of tapasya and shraddha–ascetic discipline and faith–shraddha in this
instance meaning aspiration more than faith. Many people engage in spiritual practice
for the wrong reasons, but the right one is a confidence in one’s ability to attain selfrealization.
Tapah literally means to generate heat, so tapahshraddha can also mean
heat-generating faith or aspiration, that which heats us up, builds the proverbial fire
under us, gets us moving and keeps us moving. Tapasya is the energy generator of the
wise directed by their assurance that the Goal exists and is within grasp.

Tapahshraddha is the radiance (tejas) that fills the proficient yogi. In the Chandogya
Upanishad, when a young man returns from a long period of tapasya, his teacher said
to him: “My son, your face shines like one who knows Brahman.” (Chandogya
Upanishad4:14:2) This is the effect of tapahshraddha.
The wise are vidvamsah–learned. They not only practice, they study and learn and
assimilate what they have learned. There is no place in spiritual life for pious
ignorance. Sentimental dummies are not “devotees,” they are fools. And fools do not
find God. It is very true that many people get what Yogananda called “intellectual
indigestion” from reading loads of theories and trivia. But the wise carefully choose
books of spiritual wisdom such as scriptures, lives of holy people, and the writings/
teachings of those who possess genuine inner illumination. Such books can never do
anything but good. It is especially necessary to read the teachings of realized yogis. (I
am not talking about super-gurus, glitter-gurus, and empire-building gurus, but real
Masters of the spiritual life.) Naturally, they will have to use their own good sense as to
whose words are worthwhile and whose are worthless or even poisonous. They will
not have a library of thousands of books, I assure you. But they will have a goodly
number of spiritual gems which they will perpetually read and ponder daily. Certainly
they will not spend hours a day on reading, but they will allot an appropriate amount of
time for it. Fake teachers and cults hate what I have just written, insisting that “loyal”
and “in tune” cultists will read nothing but what the cult authorizes, so the dupes will
not “get confused.” This only reveals their predatory cruelty. Their “protection” of their
“sheep” is nothing less than the “protective custody” of the Nazi death camps. They
fear that if their followers become informed as to the real nature of traditional
philosophy and yoga they will realize they are being lied to, and will sensibly go
elsewhere and find real truth. And that is bad for business.
Now comes an interesting adjective: virajah–beyond (free from) rajas. This may
seem odd, but those of you who have been yogis for some years will remember how at
the beginning of your “yoga days” you were very rajasic in your approach. First of all,
you wanted to tell everyone about it, and you went around accumulating “spiritual
stuff” of all kinds. You really began to star in your own spiritual movie, and you made
quite an epic. Your motives were perfectly all right, even laudable, but they were
rajasic, filled with activity and “passion” for getting on to the Goal. Again, the intentions
were good, but the feverishness and externalization was not. For a lot of people, when
the rajas fizzles out so does their impetus toward God. Most abandon any form of
spiritual life, while others settle down to a comfortable and ineffectual life in some yoga
cult that makes them feel secure and one of the “chosen.” But what is needed is for the
rajasic heat to mutate into the steady warmth and radiance of sattwa. Then the
aspiration and involvement actually increases, but in a fully effectual way, an
increasingly interior way. Spiritual life changes over from a compulsion to an intelligent
choice. Spiritual restlessness becomes steadiness in spiritual practice and
development. God is no longer the brass ring to strain at but an ever-present Reality
whose perception keeps on increasing in a naturally supernatural way.
And the result of all this? The upanishad says: “prayanti suryadvarena,” which
Shankara says means: “they move superbly [skillfully] along the path of the sun.” That
is, they ascend steadily and skillfully to the solar world, the realm of the Self-existent
Light that is Brahman.

Getting in Perspective
Many things are needed in life, but none more important than an overview, a
perspective on the values of life. This is true for everyone, so the sage now speaks of it
in a spiritual context.
“Let a man devoted to spiritual life examine carefully the ephemeral nature of such
enjoyment, whether here or hereafter, as may be won by good works, and so realize
that it is not by works that one gains the Eternal. Let him give no thought to transient
things, but, absorbed in meditation, let him renounce the world. If he would know the
Eternal, let him humbly approach a Guru devoted to Brahman and well-versed in the
scriptures.” (Mundaka Upanishad 1:2:12)
This needs to be looked at bit by bit.
Let a man devoted to spiritual life examine carefully the ephemeral nature of such
enjoyment, whether here or hereafter, as may be won by good works, and so realize that it
is not by works that one gains the Eternal. Back in high school I came across an
eighteenth-century collection of humor and satire. I have forgotten most of it, but there
was one story about a man who fell in love with a woman he often saw at the theater.
That was when all lighting came from candles, and in that light she looked stunningly
beautiful. He got the courage to ask her if he could visit her at home in the daytime.
She agreed, and in the daylight he saw that she was horrible-looking, incredibly old,
wore a wig and loads of make-up. He fell out of love instantly! It is the same with this
and all other worlds and the enjoyments they offer in return for good karma. It is all
deathly illusion. What we need is the light of spiritual day.
Seeing the world clearly is the only lasting antidote for the poison of worldliness.
First we approach the matter intellectually. Just the fact of inevitable death should
begin to turn us from attachment, and the fact that nothing lasts should seal our
disillusionment. Yet, old habits do indeed die hard, and there is no habit as strongly
entrenched as attraction to the world and its promises. So discipline is needed.
Let him give no thought to transient things. The wise aspirant must exert his will and
refuse to even give a thought to the “good things” offered by the world, “good things”
that will melt away in time, and that often prove to be anything but good. Look at those
that have worldly success. Misery and confusion is their daily bread, but those who
envy them are convinced that they alone have found the way to happiness. We must in
contrast refuse to even look at the mirages held out to us by the world and our own
habit-deluded mind. How will we cure the mind of its awful addictions? By being…
Absorbed in meditation. For meditation cures the fevers of the mind and heart and
dispels the hallucinations produced by illusions and desires. The only way to be
absorbed in meditation is to be constantly cultivating interior consciousness even
outside of meditation. Our whole life must become a meditation process.
Let him renounce the world. The Sanskrit word nirvedam does not really mean
renunciation, though many translators use that term. Actually, nirvedam means being
indifferent, not being influenced or moved by something–in this case the world and its
ways. It is an inner state, a condition of the mind very akin to the non-arising (nirodha)
of mental reactions (vrittih) spoken about in the Yoga Sutras as being the state of yoga.
“When your intellect has cleared itself of its delusions, you will become indifferent to
the results of all action, present or future.” (Bhagavad Gita 2:52) And consequently you
164
will be indifferent to the actions that produce those results as well as the world-stage
on which their dramas are enacted. None of this occurs just for the asking or wishing,
so Angiras give us practical advice:
If he would know the Eternal, let him humbly approach a Guru devoted to Brahman
and well-versed in the scriptures. The ideal of the upanishads often differs from that of
later Indian thought which is not based on wisdom but on whimsy–and often on
theatrical effect. Today there is a lot of talk about how valueless a teacher is who only
knows the scriptures but has no inner realization, and how wonderful is the illiterate–
or one who is ignorant of the scriptures–but who has spiritual knowledge. This is silly.
First of all, a scholar can tell you what the great masters of the spiritual life taught in
the scriptures, and you can learn from them just as you would if they were still on
earth. You cannot get spirituality from books, it is true, but you can get spiritual
instruction that will lead to the acquisition of spirituality. On the other hand, what kind
of a person, supposedly intent on gaining spiritual knowledge, will choose to remain
ignorant? Consider Sri Ramana Maharshi. He had no interest in academic matters, but
after going to Arunachala and attaining realization he became a living library of
countless spiritual texts, having read widely in several languages. So the sage tells us
that a worthy teacher has a thorough knowledge of the holy writings and is also
Brahmanishtham–established in the experiential knowledge of Brahman.
Such a teacher is rare, but we should accept no lesser teacher. If we find such a one
we must learn all we can and then apply it. If we cannot find one, then we should
diligently study the words of realized masters and follow them. The Mahayana
Buddhists say a very wonderful thing: Whenever someone resolves to seek
enlightenment a host of buddhas and bodhisattwas immediately become aware of it
and begin blessing and guiding him. Real masters never die, so we can become their
disciples no matter how long ago they lived in a physical body. This is especially true of
three great Masters who both teach and save even now: Krishna, Buddha, and Jesus.
One who sincerely, with right intention, takes refuge in them and prays for guidance
will find they respond. Such a one will need to act on what he already knows if he
hopes to gain further understanding. And if he is wise he will assiduously avoid all
those who claim to be their representatives or intermediaries.
“To a disciple who approaches reverently, who is tranquil and self-controlled, the
wise teacher gives that knowledge, faithfully and without stint, by which is known the
truly existing, the changeless Self.” (Mundaka Upanishad 1:2:13) By these words we
know the qualified student and the qualified teacher. When the two come together the
result is Perfect Knowing.

Origin and Return
“The Imperishable is the Real. As sparks innumerable fly upward from a blazing
fire, so from the depths of the Imperishable arise all things. To the depths of the
Imperishable they in turn descend.” (Mundaka Upanishad 2:1:1) This is a spectacular
simile–mostly because it happens to be the absolute truth. But a more literal
translation brings out some important points Prabhavananda decided to pass over.
Here is Swami Nikhilananda’s rendering: “As from a blazing fire, sparks essentially
akin to it fly forth by the thousand, so also, my good friend, do various beings come
forth from the imperishable Brahman and unto Him again return.” Swami
Gambhirananda, the saintly President of Ramakrishna Mission, translated it this way:
“As from a fire, fully ablaze, fly off sparks, in their thousands, that are akin to the fire,
similarly from the Immutable originate different kinds of creatures and into It again
they merge.”



Om Tat Sat
                                                        
(Continued...) 


(My humble salutations H H Swami Nirmalananda Giri ji and   Hinduism online dot com for the collection)


(The Blog  is reverently for all the seekers of truth, lovers of wisdom and   to share
the Hindu Dharma with others on the spiritual path and also this is purely  a non-commercial)



0 comments:

Post a Comment